Archive for July, 2009

Mixed Results in Wall Street! Is the recession over?

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

Reports out of Wall Street continue to be mixed. The index of leading indicators points to economic growth, but earnings from Microsoft, 3M and American Express today show a different story. Consumers continue to struggle to find credit and companies are trying to find their own ways to extend credit to their customers to stimulate demand for their products and services.

In the housing market, home re-sales are higher due to lower prices. It looks like the supply and demand for existing homes is finally finding the equilibrium point. The Dow closed above 9,000 for the first time since January 2009, indicating that market players anticipate a recovery regardless of current earnings.

Asian markets continue to show signs of recovery and economic growth with South Korea posting its best quarter since 2003! along with semiconductors and automotive industries showing great results coming from South Korea, China, and India. European markets are up with Credit Suisse announcing profits that are 29% higher this quarter showing a strong financial institution.

What does it all mean? Is it time to put money into equities? And if so, in which markets? US markets, European markets, Asian markets or other? Which industries in these markets are more likely to benefit from a global economic recovery and why? What does it all mean for the business environment here in the United States where we are facing unemployment of over 9%?

In my opinion, US companies should concentrate on sales to governments around the globe and Asian emerging markets. They should follow government spending and industries that are likely to benefit from government spending around the world. Investors should diversify investments they pursue in emerging markets since these markets are, in the lung run, dependent on US spending on foreign goods and services. When it comes to investing in US markets; again, I would pursue industries that are likely to benefit from government spending; more specifically, infrastructure. I would not pick individual companies, but rather diversify using index funds that include several players that will likely benefit from spending in infrastructure. I still believe unemployment will remain high even if we experience a recovery in the second half of 2009 since the unemployed are likely to experience structural unemployment as new industry opportunities emerge out of this recession. Many will need retraining and relocation before they can once again become productive members in our society.

Tell me your thoughts, feel free to disagree and propose a hypothesis of your own. Feel free to use news and other research sources to formulate your answer. Have fun!

The New Economy: The Story Behind Financials and Unemployment

Friday, July 17th, 2009

What a week in Wall Street! Mixed news in the financials, unemployment and housing.

J.P Morgan reported profits that were up 36% for the second quarter mostly as a result of their stable and more conservative business model, but their results continue to show difficulty in the lending operations. Goldman posted their best quarter but by increasing risk since most of the revenue increase came from its investment banking and trading operations. Citi, Bank of America and GE showed how they continue to struggle as their business models continue to adapt to new the economic reality in the financial sector.

Surprisingly, housing starts were up 3.6% in June, and unemployment claims dropped 47,000 to 522,000 last week although unemployment remains at 9.4%. In addition, the Federal Reserve continues to increase the money supply by increasing its holdings in treasury and mortgage backed securities.

What do these numbers mean for the US economy and the business environment?

Well, we need a stable financial sector before we can have sustainable economic growth. Good news in the financial sector should be positive for the business environment. However, the financial sector continues to struggle with lending and profits and revenue did not come from the right places! We need to see consumer and business lending increase before we can see sustainable economic growth. US small and mid-size businesses rely of short term and long term lending to support their short term operations. Without credit availability, new projects are delayed and layoffs become necessary; which in turn, increases unemployment.

Because the government remains the only sector where spending seems to be growing, business will be more likely to survive by doing business with the government! We will transition from a B2B economy to a Business to Government economy over the next few years. Lack of credit availability will prevent the consumer from supporting US economic growth. It will be up to the government to pick up the consumer spending lost due to difficulties in the credit markets.

So, what does it all mean for businesses and consumers? Businesses should turn their production of goods and services to match the needs and wants of government spending while consumers should retrain themselves to match the skills that will be needed in the new economy. Sectors providing goods and services to infrastructure development, green or alternative technology and business services should prosper.

Tell me what your thoughts are regarding these numbers and the business environment. Feel free to elaborate and agree or disagree with my views and the views of other bloggers!

Digesting credit, retail, and Boston sports news!

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Consumer credit went down 1.5% in May, marking the 4th consecutive decline. Retail sales were down once again, with high end retailer Abercrombie & Fitch facing a 32% decline in sales. Nonetheless, lower end retailers experienced some sales growth. Click here to see WSJ article.
Although deleveraging is good for the American consumer in the long run, the lack of credit availability continues to hurt the retail sector in the short term. As a result of the decline in sales, the sector is likely to continue to generate job losses that may spread to other sectors of the economy that provide goods and services to retailers. Firms currently serving the retail sector, such as those in the technology industry, should shift their marketing efforts to target government spending. Those able to benefit directly or indirectly from the economic stimulus package will be the survivors in the long run.

What do you think these measures of economic performance by the retail sector mean for the overall US economy; and specifically, the labor market currently facing unemployment of 9.5%?

On a more positive note, the Red Sox won against Oakland and the Celtics gave Rasheed Wallace a 3-year deal! Read more about NE sports.